Is the Nikkor 18-200mm VR worth it? - the best camera tripod for art
I have heard that this goal is not so good, I heard he is great. Anyway, I'll buy a D90 body soon and I have no purpose, and the money for a drink. Target value, when my own? I like landscapes, wildlife and artistic shots. The shots seemed attractive 16-85 wider and less distortion, but of course makes me want to telephoto. I exorbitantly on a tight budget. The combo of the lens of the camera and tripod dollar has less than 1600th I will buy the target value of my money to get 18-200 mm? I get an extension of the 16-85mm? Oh, and I have asked a similar question to people before and all they say is the D80, rather than buy and have more money. But what I've heard that the D90 has a good functioning of the evening, or to react tobe good. Sorry for my ramblings, but I am very confused. So, what I mean, what is the best, I must be able to install most of the professionals to get for $ 1600? Tripod, lens, camera, as the land of the landscape, fauna and art photography. Thank you a ton for your help
Sunday, February 14, 2010
The Best Camera Tripod For Art Is The Nikkor 18-200mm VR Worth It?
3 comments:
The lens 18 -200 is a good lap. It is a bit soft, 200, (IMO very little), but most of all stretched away soft. For most photographers can look for and cover almost all areas for recreational activities required. It's great to rely on them. There are some cuts. First, his f/3.5-5.6 zoom up to their open mesh 5.6. It is a goal very quickly. Current DSLR better higher ISO so it is not a deal breaker in many situations, but in those in which a quick goal that will not happen. Second, do not have the optical quality glasses that cost thousands of dollars as the Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 (1100 U.S. only for this purpose) or the Nikon 200-400mm f / 4 (6000 goal of the United States alone, b)UT is well built, and we will do a good job and last years. With a bit like my car to me, where I will surely do it again, but do not compare to a Mercedes. In terms of combinations of camera lenses work best for you, then it really depends on what you do with it. Go to Nikon USA and you will see the comparative tables. Make a list of what qualities are needed is you and I do not like you use the list to the camera at the next game in its price class. The big advantage is Nikon's backward compatibility, so if you have the lenses made of glass not be afraid, used to trust buying from a dealer to find. Gitzo tripods I like the right equipment or Arca Swiss head, butexpensive, so you can also view arc / MANFROTTO, Benbo, Induro, Manfrotto or label Adorama. Again, you have no fear of a good used as a trusted dealer. If it be someone who wanted only to carbon instead of aluminum, so you can use a little heavier, the tripod will be used in many /. Make sure that the tripod head and you're saving for the weight of the lens and the qualified body you want to view them. Some $ 40 tripods are simply not enough study on a few big camera and lens to count. This is not the factor of 1.5 in the cultures to take into account all the dimensions of the Nikon APS-C so that multiplies the focal length of 35 mm by 1.5 to get the APS-C-equivalent. 18-105 if the above 27 to 158 (157.5 would be very technical), rather than a list of 28 to 180 mm
Oh, and Recormakes the first goal is a good lens, so that each zoom lens that is not prime. The F1.8 35mm is mentioned a cousin of 18-105, while a good lens is a zoom and not a primary objective.
I do not have as many goals as the poster here, but the more I 50mm F1.4 for my computer, the digital equivalent to a 75mm on the D300 for a good presentation with good bokeh are. Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G if I have a wide angle. Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G every goal and if I get the Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8, or if the light is good, Tokina AT-X 840 80-400 mm f/4.5 -5.6 not only my Nikon lens, but with the factor of culture is an inexpensive way for me is have a field goal for a 600 mm, but there is some chromatic aberration and full zoom, such as relatively 18-200slow zoom lens completely. If you already can afford a $ 200 Nikon 400mm f / 4, is 80-400.
First, it will be very surprised how little a telephoto lens, while most balls shot! I have a lot of "the objective, and use other 3 .... Here is what I use: Nikon 18-105 lens (lens of all the great shots. Nikon 10-24mm (ultra-wide angle) and a 35 mm Nikon DX F1.8 is first (as the perception about my goal, sees what the eye sees, and it is a very fast lens! (199.00). best setting for almost everyone:
Nikon D90, Nikon DX 18-105mm (1250.00) for the pair, a light stand (40.00) when the camera (30.00) Tripod Bag (20.00), and the extra battery (35.00) , Map 32 G (40.00). You do not need more than that! And you have a company founded with the first. Add lentils, as you see fit, for all lenses of the Nikon AF(almost all of the work) into the camera, because the motor in the body, not the goal. The top lens is a VR lens (stabilized). Good luck and happy shooting.
Note ... 18-105 lens equivalent to a 28mm film camera lens - 180mm Length ...... Target in less than full-frame cameras is very misleading!
This goal is literally a miracle of technology. It offers performance, Sharp as a decent 18mm to 200mm zoom. (It provides a focal length range of 27-300 on a Nikon digital camera because of harvesting sensor 1.5 's). This is a DX lens, and is therefore only designed for Nikon digital cameras, not film cameras. It is a DX lens also enables this goal lighter and smaller than a classic "length" of the lens. I was told by experts that this goal a "monster" size, if not for the fact that it is a DX lens. As it seems, is small, lightweight and feels good on my D70s mounted.
This is not a cheap destination. He is in a position to give professional pictures in their full range of levels, but certainly not the best lens in a GIVis broad - that is the zoom lens. The fantastic (yes, I think is fantastic), this goal nothing more than an incredible focal length range from wide angle to telescopic pin, which offers vivid crisp images. Oh, to produce a lot of goals RAW images brighter and more expensive to offer bigger, heavier Nikkor 70-200 VR brighter images with better bokeh, and the angle of the many great Zoom-Nikkor exceed this target and the other end of the series, but no lens I know this lens able to carry out their full range. This lens is capable of pleasing pictures, bright and alive througout its range can.
An important feature of the 18-200 VR is the technology to reduce vibration, which is integrated into the lens. This stabilizes the lens and allows you to take good pictures in a much dimmer liGht, as it practically and to some degree virtual reality as a tripod to stabilize the camera. The VR function also contribute to the sharpness of the images. VR is no substitute for fast glass, the one thing clear about this very serious photographer is not (by major professional goals such as the 70-200 VR Zoom incomparable, for example, or zoom wonderful 17 -55). A discussion on the shortcomings and advantages of VR is beyond the scope of this review, but suffice it to say that VR 18-200 VR produce this goal on its ability, sharp images.
This is the last "walk" lens and the lens is completely of choice in many or most situations where it is simply impossible, or CTo change lenses or more of the lens. Almost all users of Nikon digital cameras examine the request. I am impressed by the pictures, which I reached with the 18-200VR.
Price: € 699.00
Post a Comment